Week 3 Expected Fantasy Points: Rushing and Receiving

Look at past posts for the methodology on how the expected fantasy points calculation was enhanced using historical trends for fantasy points based on air yards, yards after catch, yard line and touchdown ratios. Data was pulled using nflscrapR.

The first table is a shorter version with columns for expected fantasy points, actual fantasy points and the difference in total, for rushing and for receiving. The second table, which is much wider, includes all the individual components for the rushing and receiving calculations. Unfortunately, the data I have doesn’t differentiate between positions, so running backs, wide receivers and tight end are all in the same table. Continue reading “Week 3 Expected Fantasy Points: Rushing and Receiving”

Marcus Mariota, the Red Zone and the Danger of Splitting Small Samples

It’s been highlighted in reporting for at least the last year that Marcus Mariota has some very gaudy red zone stats. In 103 career red zone attempts, Mariota has thrown for 475 yards, 33 touchdowns and zero interceptions. His 112.7 quarterback rating is better than any quarterback with more than 10 red zone attempts.

The topic is Mariota’s incredible red zone numbers has come up again after receiving praise from the head coach of this week’s opponent, Pete Carroll. Continue reading “Marcus Mariota, the Red Zone and the Danger of Splitting Small Samples”

How Is Deshaun Watson Currently Second in ESPN’s QBR?

Last week I started posting the expected points added (EPA) for Week 1 by quarterback. The total figure aggregates the EPA on all the different types of play a quarterback was involved in: passes, interceptions, scrambles and runs. Sam Bradford led all Week 1 passers in total EPA and EPA per play, and his efficiency mark still stands at the top after missing Week 2.

One of the more well-known quarterback statistics that uses EPA in its calculation is ESPN’s Total Quarterback Rating (QBR). But QBR isn’t as simple as totaling up the various EPA figures, it adjusted credit/blame for the quarterback on various plays and also has a “clutch-weighting” on individual plays based on how close the score is at that time. I like QBR in concept, and I believe the analysis built into the calculation is likely sound. But, when there is a confusing or counterintuitive result in the final QBR numbers, we’re left guessing as to why QBR differs so much from fan impressions, or even the raw EPA figures. Continue reading “How Is Deshaun Watson Currently Second in ESPN’s QBR?”

Quarterback Expected Points Added Through Week 2

Here are the expected points added (EPA) numbers through Week 2 for quarterbacks with at least 20 passes. This week I arranged the leaderboard by expected points added per play (EPA/P), since efficiency, not volume, is my preferred way to view the impact quarterbacks have on the game.

Sam Bradford still sits atop after only facing the Saints, but now familiar names like Matt RyanDerek Carr and Tom Brady join him near the top. The most surprising name is Jay Culter, who performed well in his first start, especially in terms of limiting turnover and only losing a combined five yards (-2.3 EPA) on two sacks.

Continue reading “Quarterback Expected Points Added Through Week 2”

Week 2 Expected Fantasy Points: Rushing and Receiving

Last week I put together an expected fantasy points calculation for receiving, using air yards data available from nflscrapR to enhance the typical calculation that only uses yard line. By using air yards, we were able to calculate more accurate expected catch rates, expected yards and expected touchdowns based upon how far the ball was thrown. For example, you’re more likely to catch a short pass, but a longer pass that would be caught near the end zone gives you a much higher chance at a touchdown.

This week I’m adding expected fantasy point from rushing to the calculation. I found that yards to go on a play has strong relationship to yards gained,1 and I used that relationship to calculate expected rushing yards for each play. Continue reading “Week 2 Expected Fantasy Points: Rushing and Receiving”

Week 1 Expected Points Added: Kickers

Earlier this week I posted the Week 1 expected points added (EPA) for quarterbacks. What’s even more exciting than quarterback EPA? Kicker EPA!!

Seriously, I had some kicking EPA code lying around and decided to run the 2017 numbers through the model and calculate how much actual value these guys are providing so far this year.

Expected points is truly a great way to judge kickers, whether a kick is good or not is almost entirely on the kicker, as opposed to passing and rushing where 11 offensive and defensive players are all influencing the results to varying degrees.

The kicker EPA calculation is based on the actual points scored on each kick versus your league-average expectation for a play from that down, distance, yard line and time of game.

Kickers have vastly improved their kicking over the years, making anything under 50 yards a high probability make.

Continue reading “Week 1 Expected Points Added: Kickers”

NFL 2017 Week 1: Quarterback Expected Points Added

After putting together a quick analysis of Deshaun Watson‘s Week 2 performance from an expected points added (EPA) perspective, I decided that I might as well put all the Week 1 numbers out there.

This is a good way of judging a quarterback’s total impact by breaking out his EPA generated in various phases of the game: passing, sacks (negative), scrambling and rushing. Scroll the table to the right on to see all the EPA components.

To get some perspective on how much a point added is worth, Max Mulitz has estimated that roughly 36 points – as part of point differential – equal out to one additional win versus an eight win baseline. Keep that number in mind when looking at these numbers. Continue reading “NFL 2017 Week 1: Quarterback Expected Points Added”